Proteins: Description, Uses,
Function and Formation

Proteins are large organic
compounds made of amino acids
arranged in a linear chain and joined together between the carboxyl atom
of one amino acid and the amine nitrogen of another. This bond is called a peptide
bond. The sequence of amino acids in a protein is defined by a gene and encoded in the
genetic
code. Although this genetic code specifies 20 "standard" amino
acids, the residues in a protein are often chemically altered in post-translational modification:
either before the protein can function in the cell, or as part of control
mechanisms. Proteins can also work together to achieve a particular function,
and they often associate to form stable complexes.
Like other biological macromolecules
such as polysaccharides and nucleic
acids, proteins are essential parts of all living organisms and participate
in every process within cells.
Many proteins are enzymes
that catalyze
biochemical reactions, and are vital to metabolism.
Other proteins have structural or mechanical functions, such as the proteins in
the cytoskeleton,
which forms a system of scaffolding that maintains cell shape. Proteins are also
important in cell signaling, immune responses,
cell
adhesion, and the cell cycle. Protein is also a necessary component in our
diet, since animals cannot synthesise all the amino acids and must obtain essential amino acids from food. Through the
process of digestion,
animals break down ingested protein into free amino acids that can be used for
protein synthesis.
The name protein comes from the Greek
πρώτα ("prota"), meaning "of
primary importance" and were first described and named by Jöns Jakob Berzelius in 1838. However, their
central role in living organisms was not fully appreciated until 1926, when James
B. Sumner showed that the enzyme urease was a
protein. Only 32 years later, the first protein structure was solved, that of myoglobin by Max Perutz
and Sir
John Cowdery Kendrew in 1958,[1]
which led to their receiving a Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Biochemistry
Main articles: Amino acid
and peptide
bond

Resonance structures of the peptide
bond that links individual amino acids to form a protein polymer. 
Section of a protein structure showing serine and
alanine residues linked together by peptide bonds. Carbons are shown in white
and hydrogens are omitted for clarity.
Proteins are linear polymers built from 20
different L-alpha-amino acids. All amino acids share common structural
features including an alpha carbon to which an amino group, a carboxyl group,
and a variable side chain are bonded.
The side chains of the standard amino acids, detailed in the list of standard amino acids, have
varying chemical properties that produce proteins' three-dimensional structure
and are therefore critical to protein function. The amino acids in a
polypeptide chain are linked by peptide
bonds formed in a dehydration reaction. Once linked in the protein chain,
an individual amino acid is called a residue and the linked series of
carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen atoms are known as the main chain or protein
backbone. The peptide bond has two resonance forms that contribute some double bond
character and inhibit rotation around its axis, so that the alpha carbons are
roughly coplanar.
The other two dihedral angles in the peptide bond determine the
local shape assumed by the protein backbone.
Due to the chemical structure of the individual
amino acids, the protein chain has directionality. The end of the protein with
a free carboxyl group is known as the C-terminus
or carboxy terminus, while the end with a free amino group is known as the N-terminus
or amino terminus.
There is some ambiguity between the usage of the
words protein, polypeptide, and peptide. Protein
is generally used to refer to the complete biological molecule in a stable conformation, while peptide is generally
reserved for a short amino acid oligomers often lacking a stable 3-dimensional structure.
However, the boundary between the two is ill-defined and usually lies near
20-30 residues.[2]
Polypeptide can refer to any single linear chain of amino acids, usually
regardless of length, but often implies an absence of a single defined conformation.
Synthesis

Proteins are assembled from amino acids using
information encoded in genes.
Each protein has its own unique amino acid sequence that is specified by the nucleotide
sequence of the gene encoding this protein. The genetic
code is a set of three-nucleotide sets called codons and each
three-nucleotide combination stands for an amino acid, for example ATG stands
for methionine.
Because DNA contains
four nucleotides, the total number of possible codons is 64; hence, there is
some redundancy in the genetic code and some amino acids are specified by more
than one codon. Genes encoded in DNA are first transcribed into pre-messenger
RNA (mRNA) by proteins such as RNA
polymerase. Most organisms then process the pre-mRNA (also known as a primary
transcript) using various forms of post-transcriptional modification
to form the mature mRNA, which is then used as a template for protein synthesis
by the ribosome.
In prokaryotes
the mRNA may either be used as soon as it is produced, or be bound by a
ribosome after having moved away from the nucleoid. In
contrast, eukaryotes
make mRNA in the cell nucleus and then translocate it across the nuclear
membrane into the cytoplasm, where protein synthesis then takes place. The
rate of protein synthesis is higher in prokaryotes than eukaryotes and can
reach up to 20 amino acids per second.[3]
The process of synthesizing a protein from an mRNA
template is known as translation. The mRNA is loaded onto the
ribosome and is read three nucleotides at a time by matching each codon to its base pairing
anticodon
located on a transfer RNA molecule, which carries the amino acid
corresponding to the codon it recognizes. The enzyme aminoacyl tRNA synthetase
"charges" the tRNA molecules with the correct amino acids. The
growing polypeptide is often termed the nascent chain. Proteins are
always biosynthesized from N-terminus to C-terminus.
The size of a synthesized protein can be measured
by the number of amino acids it contains and by its total molecular
mass, which is normally reported in units of daltons (synonymous
with atomic mass units), or the derivative unit kilodalton (kDa). Yeast proteins are on
average 466 amino acids long and 53 kDa in mass.[2]
The largest known proteins are the titins, a component of the muscle sarcomere,
with a molecular mass of almost 3,000 kDa and a total length of almost 27,000
amino acids.[4]
Chemical synthesis
Short proteins can also be synthesized chemically
in the laboratory by a family of methods known as peptide
synthesis, which rely on organic
synthesis techniques such as chemical
ligation to produce peptides in high yield. Chemical synthesis allows for
the introduction of non-natural amino acids into polypeptide chains, such as
attachment of fluorescent probes to amino acid side chains. These
methods are useful in laboratory biochemistry
and cell
biology, though generally not for commercial applications. Chemical
synthesis is inefficient for polypeptides longer than about 300 amino acids,
and the synthesized proteins may not readily assume their native tertiary structure. Most chemical synthesis
methods proceed from C-terminus to N-terminus, opposite the biological
reaction.
Structure of
Proteins

Three possible representations of the
three-dimensional structure of the protein triose phosphate isomerase. Left:
all-atom representation colored by atom type. Middle: "cartoon"
representation illustrating the backbone conformation, colored by secondary
structure. Right: Solvent-accessible surface representation colored by residue
type (acidic residues red, basic residues blue, polar residues green, nonpolar
residues white).
Most proteins fold
into unique 3-dimensional structures. The shape into which a protein naturally
folds is known as its native state. Although many proteins can fold
unassisted simply through the structural propensities of their component amino
acids, others require the aid of molecular chaperones to
efficiently fold to their native states. Biochemists often refer to four
distinct aspects of a protein's structure:
In addition to these levels of structure, proteins
may shift between several related structures in performing their biological
function. In the context of these functional rearrangements, these tertiary or
quaternary structures are usually referred to as "conformations," and transitions between
them are called conformational changes. Such changes are often induced
by the binding of a substrate molecule to an enzyme's active site,
or the physical region of the protein that participates in chemical catalysis.

Molecular surface of several proteins showing
their comparative sizes. From left to right are: Antibody (IgG),
Hemoglobin,
Insulin (a
hormone), Adenylate kinase (an enzyme), and Glutamine synthetase (an enzyme).
Proteins can be informally divided into three main
classes, which correlate with typical tertiary structures: globular
proteins, fibrous proteins, and membrane
proteins. Almost all globular proteins are soluble and many
are enzymes. Fibrous proteins are often structural; membrane proteins often
serve as receptors or provide channels for polar or
charged molecules to pass through the cell membrane.
A special case of intramolecular hydrogen bonds
within proteins, poorly shielded from water attack and hence promoting their
own dehydration,
are called dehydrons.
Structure
determination
Discovering the tertiary structure of a protein,
or the quaternary structure of its complexes, can provide important clues about
how the protein performs its function. Common experimental methods of structure
determination include X-ray crystallography and NMR
spectroscopy, both of which can produce information at atomic resolution. Cryoelectron microscopy is used to produce
lower-resolution structural information about very large protein complexes,
including assembled viruses;[5]
a variant known as electron crystallography can also produce
high-resolution information in some cases, especially for two-dimensional
crystals of membrane proteins.[6]
Solved structures are usually deposited in the Protein
Data Bank (PDB), a freely available resource from which structural data
about thousands of proteins can be obtained in the form of Cartesian coordinates for each atom in the
protein.
There are many more known gene sequences than
there are solved protein structures. Further, the set of solved structures is
biased toward those proteins that can be easily subjected to the experimental
conditions required by one of the major structure determination methods. In
particular, globular proteins are comparatively easy to crystallize
in preparation for X-ray crystallography, which remains the oldest and most
common structure determination technique. Membrane proteins, by contrast, are difficult
to crystallize and are underrepresented in the PDB.[7]
Structural genomics initiatives have attempted
to remedy these deficiencies by systematically solving representative
structures of major fold classes. Protein structure prediction methods
attempt to provide a means of generating a plausible structure for a proteins
whose structures have not been experimentally determined.
Cellular functions
Proteins are the chief actors within the cell,
said to be carrying out the duties specified by the information encoded in
genes.[2]
With the exception of certain types of RNA, most other biological
molecules are relatively inert elements upon which proteins act. Proteins make
up half the dry weight of an E. coli cell, while other macromolecules such as DNA and
RNA make up only 3% and 20% respectively.[8]
The total complement of proteins expressed in a particular cell or cell type is
known as its proteome.

The enzyme hexokinase
is shown as a simple ball-and-stick molecular model. To scale in the top
right-hand corner are its two substrates, ATP and glucose.
The chief characteristic of proteins that enables
them to carry out their diverse cellular functions is their ability to bind
other molecules specifically and tightly. The region of the protein responsible
for binding another molecule is known as the binding
site and is often a depression or "pocket" on the molecular
surface. This binding ability is mediated by the tertiary structure of the
protein, which defines the binding site pocket, and by the chemical properties
of the surrounding amino acids' side chains. Protein binding can be
extraordinarily tight and specific; for example, the ribonuclease inhibitor protein binds to
human angiogenin
with a sub-femtomolar dissociation constant (<10-15
M) but does not bind at all to its amphibian homolog onconase (>1
M). Extremely minor chemical changes such as the addition of a single methyl
group to a binding partner can sometimes suffice to nearly eliminate binding;
for example, the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase specific to the
amino acid valine
discriminates against the very similar side chain of the amino acid isoleucine.
Proteins can bind to other proteins as well as to
small-molecule substrates. When proteins bind specifically to other copies of
the same molecule, they can oligomerize to form fibrils; this process occurs often in
structural proteins that consist of globular monomers that self-associate to
form rigid fibers. Protein-protein interactions also
regulate enzymatic activity, control progression through the cell cycle,
and allow the assembly of large protein
complexes that carry out many closely related reactions with a common
biological function. Proteins can also bind to, or even be integrated into,
cell membranes. The ability of binding partners to induce conformational changes
in proteins allows the construction of enormously complex signaling
networks.
Enzymes
The best-known role of proteins in the cell is
their duty as enzymes,
which catalyze
chemical reactions. Enzymes are usually highly specific catalysts that
accelerate only one or a few chemical reactions. Enzymes effect most of the
reactions involved in metabolism and catabolism
as well as DNA replication, DNA repair,
and RNA
synthesis. Some enzymes act on other proteins to add or remove chemical
groups in a process known as post-translational modification.
About 4,000 reactions are known to be catalyzed by enzymes.[9]
The rate acceleration conferred by enzymatic catalysis is often enormous - as
much as 1017-fold increase in rate over the uncatalyzed reaction in
the case of orotate decarboxylase.[10]
The molecules bound and acted upon by enzymes are
known as substrates.
Although enzymes can consist of hundreds of amino acids, it is usually only a
small fraction of the residues that come in contact with the substrate. and an
even smaller fraction - 3-4 residues on average - that are directly involved in
catalysis.[11]
The region of the enzyme that binds the substrate and contains the catalytic
residues is known as the active site.
Structural
Proteins
Structural proteins confer stiffness and rigidity
to otherwise fluid biological components. Most structural proteins are fibrous
proteins; for example, actin and tubulin are globular and soluble as monomers but polymerize to
form long, stiff fibers that comprise the cytoskeleton,
which allows the cell to maintain its shape and size. Collagen and elastin are
critical components of connective tissue such as cartilage,
and keratin is
found in hard or filamentous structures such as hair, nails,
feathers, hooves, and some animal
shells which ultimately becomes coal or oil as a hydrocarbon..
Other proteins that serve structural functions are
motor
proteins such as myosin, kinesin, and dynein, which are capable of generating mechanical forces.
These proteins are crucial for cellular motility of
single-celled organisms and the sperm of many sexually reproducing multicellular organisms.
They also generate the forces exerted by contracting muscles.
Methods of study
As some of the most commonly studied biological
molecules, the activities and structures of proteins are examined both in
vitro and in vivo. In vitro studies of purified proteins in
controlled environments are useful for learning how a protein carries out its
function: for example, enzyme kinetics studies explore the chemical mechanism of an enzyme's catalytic activity
and its relative affinity for various possible substrate molecules. By
contrast, in vivo experiments on proteins' activities within cells or
even within whole organisms can provide complementary information about where a
protein functions and how it is regulated.
Protein
purification
In order to perform in vitro analyses, a
protein must be purified away from other cellular components. This process
usually begins with cell lysis, in which a cell's membrane is disrupted and its
internal contents released into a solution known as a crude
lysate. The resulting mixture can be purified using ultracentrifugation, which fractionates the
various cellular components into fractions containing soluble proteins;
membrane lipids
and proteins; cellular organelles, and nucleic
acids. Precipitation by a method known as salting out
can concentrate the proteins from this lysate. Various types of chromatography
are then used to isolate the protein or proteins of interest based on
properties such as molecular weight, net charge and binding affinity. The level
of purification can be monitored using gel electrophoresis if the desired protein's
molecular weight is known, by spectroscopy
if the protein has distinguishable spectroscopic features, or by enzyme
assays if the protein has enzymatic activity.
For natural proteins, a series of purification
steps may be necessary to obtain protein sufficiently pure for laboratory
applications. To simplify this process, genetic engineering is often used to add
chemical features to proteins that make them easier to purify without affecting
their structure or activity. Here, a "tag" consisting of a specific
amino acid sequence, often a series of histidine
residues (a "His-tag"),
is attached to one terminus of the protein. As a result, when the lysate is
passed over a chromatography column containing nickel, the
histidine residues ligate the nickel and attach to the column while the
untagged components of the lysate pass unimpeded.
Cellular
localization

Proteins in different cellular compartments and structures tagged
with green fluorescent protein.
The study of proteins in vivo is often
concerned with the synthesis and localization of the protein within the cell.
Although many intracellular proteins are synthesized in the cytoplasm and
membrane-bound or secreted proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, the specifics of how
proteins are targeted to specific organelles or cellular
structures is often unclear. A useful technique for assessing cellular
localization uses genetic engineering to express in a cell a fusion
protein or chimera consisting of the natural protein of
interest linked to a "reporter" such as green fluorescent protein (GFP). The
fused protein's position within the cell can be cleanly and efficiently
visualized using microscopy, as shown in the figure opposite.
Through another genetic engineering application
known as site-directed mutagenesis, researchers
can alter the protein sequence and hence its structure, cellular localization,
and susceptibility to regulation, which can be followed in vivo by GFP
tagging or in vitro by enzyme
kinetics and binding studies.
Proteomics and
bioinformatics
The total complement of proteins present in a cell
or cell type is known as its proteome, and the study of such large-scale data sets
defines the field of proteomics, named by analogy to the related field of genomics. Key
experimental techniques in proteomics include protein microarrays, which allow the detection
of the relative levels of a large number of proteins present in a cell, and two-hybrid screening, which allows the
systematic exploration of protein-protein interactions. The total
complement of biologically possible such interactions is known as the interactome.
A systematic attempt to determine the structures of proteins representing every
possible fold is known as structural genomics.
The large amount of genomic and proteomic data
available for a variety of organisms, including the human
genome, allows researchers to efficiently identify homologous proteins in distantly related
organisms by sequence alignment. Sequence profiling tools can perform more
specific sequence manipulations such as restriction enzyme maps, open reading frame analyses for nucleotide sequences,
and secondary structure prediction. From this data phylogenetic
trees can be constructed and evolutionary
hypotheses developed using special software like ClustalW
regarding the ancestry of modern organisms and the genes they express. The
field of bioinformatics seeks to assemble, annotate, and
analyze genomic and proteomic data, applying computational
techniques to biological problems such as gene
finding and cladistics.
Structure
prediction and simulation
Complementary to the field of structural genomics,
protein structure prediction seeks to
develop efficient ways to provide plausible models for proteins whose
structures have not yet been determined experimentally. The most successful
type of structure prediction, known as homology
modeling, relies on the existence of a "template" structure with
sequence similarity to the protein being modeled; structural genomics' goal is
to provide sufficient representation in solved structures to model most of
those that remain. Although producing accurate models remains a challenge when
only distantly related template structures are available, it has been suggested
that sequence alignment is the bottleneck in this process, as quite accurate
models can be produced if a "perfect" sequence alignment is known.[12]
Many structure prediction methods have served to inform the emerging field of protein engineering, in which novel protein
folds have already been designed.[13]
A more complex computational problem is the prediction of intermolecular
interactions, such as in molecular
docking and protein-protein interaction
prediction.
The processes of protein folding and binding can
be simulated using techniques derived from molecular dynamics, which increasingly take
advantage of distributed computing as in the Folding@Home
project. The folding of small alpha-helical protein domains such as the villin headpiece[14] and the HIV accessory protein[15]
have been successfully simulated in silico, and hybrid methods that
combine standard molecular dynamics with quantum
mechanics calculations have allowed exploration of the electronic states of
rhodopsins.[16]
Nutrition
Most microorganisms
and plants can biosynthesize all 20 standard amino acids, while animals must
obtain some of the amino acids from the diet.[8]
Key enzymes in the biosynthetic pathways that synthesize certain amino acids -
such as aspartokinase, which catalyzes the first step in the
synthesis of lysine,
methionine,
and threonine
from aspartate
- are not present in animals. The amino acids that an organism cannot
synthesize on its own are referred to as essential amino acids. (This designation is
often used to specifically identify those essential to humans.) If amino
acids are present in the environment, most microorganisms can conserve energy
by taking up the amino acids from the environment and downregulating their own
biosynthetic pathways. Bacteria are often engineered in the laboratory to lack the genes
necessary for synthesizing a particular amino acid, providing a selectable
marker for the success of transfection,
or the introduction of foreign DNA.
In animals, amino acids are obtained through the
consumption of foods containing protein. Ingested proteins are broken down
through digestion,
which typically involves denaturation of the protein through exposure to acid and degradation by
the action of enzymes called proteases. Ingestion of essential amino acids is critical to
the health of the organism, since the biosynthesis of proteins that include
these amino acids is inhibited by their low concentration. Amino acids are also
an important dietary source of nitrogen. Some ingested amino acids, especially those that
are not essential, are not used directly for protein biosynthesis. Instead,
they are converted to carbohydrates through gluconeogenesis,
which is also used under starvation conditions to generate glucose from the
body's own proteins, particularly those found in muscle.
History
Proteins were recognized as a distinct class of
biological molecules in the eighteenth century by Antoine Fourcroy and others.
Members of this class (called the "albuminoids", Eiweisskörper,
or matières albuminoides) were recognized by their ability to coagulate or flocculate
under various treatments such as heat or acid; well-known examples at the start
of the nineteenth century included albumen from egg whites,
blood serum
albumin, fibrin,
and wheat gluten. The
similarity between the cooking of egg whites and the curdling of milk was
recognized even in ancient times; for example, the name albumen for the
egg-white protein was coined by Pliny
the Elder from the Latin albus ovi (egg white).
With the advice of Jöns Jakob Berzelius, the Dutch chemist Gerhardus Johannes Mulder carried out elemental analyses of common animal and plant
proteins. To everyone's surprise, all proteins had nearly the same empirical
formula, roughly C400H620N100O120
with individual sulfur and phosphorus atoms. Mulder published his findings in
two papers (1837,1838) and hypothesized that there was one basic substance (Grundstoff)
of proteins, and that it was synthesized by plants and absorbed from them by
animals in digestion. Berzelius was an early proponent of this theory and
proposed the name "protein" for this substance in a letter dated 10 July 1838
The name protein that I propose
for the organic oxide of fibrin and albumin, I wanted to derive from [the Greek
word] πρωτειος, because it appears to
be the primitive or principal substance of animal nutrition.
Mulder went on to identify the products of protein
degradation such as the amino acid, leucine, for
which he found a (nearly correct) molecular weight of 131 Da.
The minimum molecular weight suggested by Mulder's
analyses was roughly 9 kDa, hundreds of times larger than other molecules
being studied. Hence, the chemical structure of proteins (their primary
structure) was an active area of research until 1949, when Fred Sanger
sequenced insulin.
The (correct) theory that proteins were linear polymers of amino acids
linked by peptide bonds was proposed independently and
simultaneously by Franz Hofmeister and Emil
Fischer at the same conference in 1902. However, some scientists were
sceptical that such long macromolecules could be stable in solution.
Consequently, numerous alternative theories of the protein primary
structure were proposed, e.g., the colloidal hypothesis that proteins were
assemblies of small molecules, the cyclol hypothesis of Dorothy Wrinch, the diketopiperazine hypothesis
of Emil Abderhalden and the pyrrol/piperidine
hypothesis of Troensgard (1942). Most of these theories had difficulties in
accounting for the fact that the digestion of proteins yielded peptides and amino acids.
Proteins were finally shown to be macromolecules of well-defined composition
(and not colloidal mixtures) by Theodor
Svedberg using analytical ultracentrifugation. The
possibility that some proteins are non-covalent associations of such macromolecules
was shown by Gilbert Smithson Adair (by measuring the osmotic
pressure of hemoglobin) and, later, by Frederic M. Richards in his studies of
ribonuclease S. The mass spectrometry of proteins has long been a
useful technique for identifying posttranslational modifications and,
more recently, for probing protein structure.
Most proteins are difficult to purify in more than milligram quantities, even
using the most modern methods. Hence, early studies focused on proteins that
could be purified in large quantities, e.g., those of blood, egg white,
various toxins,
and digestive/metabolic enzymes obtained from slaughterhouses.
Many techniques of protein purification were developed during World War
II in a project led by Edwin
Joseph Cohn to purify blood proteins to help keep soldiers alive. In the
late 1950's, the Armour Hot Dog Co. purified 1 kg (= one million
milligrams) of pure bovine pancreatic ribonuclease
A and made it freely available to scientists around the world. This
generous act made RNase A the main protein for basic research for the next few
decades, resulting in several Nobel Prizes.
The study of protein folding began in 1910 with a
famous paper by Henrietta Chick and C. J. Martin, in which they showed that the
flocculation
of a protein was composed of two distinct processes: the precipitation of a protein from solution
was preceded by another process called denaturation,
in which the protein became much less soluble, lost its enzymatic activity and
became more chemically reactive. In the mid-1920's, Tim Anson and Alfred
Mirsky proposed that denaturation was a reversible process, a correct
hypothesis that was initially lampooned by some scientists as "unboiling
the egg". Anson also suggested that denaturation was a two-state
("all-or-none") process, in which one fundamental molecular
transition resulted in the drastic changes in solubility, enzymatic activity and
chemical reactivity; he further noted that the free energy changes upon
denaturation were much smaller than those typically involved in chemical
reactions. In 1929, Hsien Wu hypothesized that denaturation was protein
folding, a purely conformational change that resulted in the exposure of amino
acid side chains to the solvent. According to this (correct) hypothesis,
exposure of aliphatic and reactive side chains to solvent rendered the protein
less soluble and more reactive, whereas the loss of a specific conformation
caused the loss of enzymatic activity. Although considered plausible, Wu's
hypothesis was not immediately accepted, since so little was known of protein
structure and enzymology and other factors could account for the changes in
solubility, enzymatic activity and chemical reactivity. In the early 1960's, Chris Anfinsen showed that the folding of ribonuclease
A was fully reversible with no external cofactors needed, verifying the
"thermodynamic hypothesis" of protein folding that the folded state
represents the global minimum of free energy
for the protein.
The hypothesis of protein folding was followed by
research into the physical interactions that stabilize folded protein
structures. The crucial role of hydrophobic interactions was hypothesized
by Dorothy Wrinch and Irving
Langmuir, as a mechanism that might stabilize her cyclol structures. Although
supported by J. D. Bernal and others, this (correct) hypothesis was
rejected along with the cyclol hypothesis, which was disproven in the 1930's by
Linus
Pauling (among others). Instead, Pauling championed the idea that protein
structure was stabilized mainly by hydrogen
bonds, an idea advanced initially by William
Astbury (1933). Remarkably, Pauling's incorrect theory about H-bonds
resulted in his correct models for the secondary structure elements of proteins, the alpha helix
and the beta
sheet. The hydrophobic interaction was restored to its correct prominence
by a famous article in 1959 by Walter Kauzman on
denaturation,
based partly on work by Kaj Linderstrom-Lang. The ionic nature
of proteins was demonstrated by Bjerrum, Weber and Arne
Tiselius, but Linderstrom-Lang showed that the charges were generally
accessible to solvent and not bound to each other (1949).
The secondary and low-resolution tertiary structure of globular proteins was
investigated initially by hydrodynamic methods, such as analytical ultracentrifugation and flow birefringence. Spectroscopic methods to
probe protein structure (such as circular dichroism, fluorescence, near-ultraviolet
and infrared absorbance) were developed in the 1950's. The first
atomic-resolution structures of proteins were solved by X-ray crystallography in the 1960's and by NMR in the 1980's.
As of 2006, the Protein Data Bank has nearly 40,000
atomic-resolution structures of proteins. In more recent times, cryo-electron microscopy of large
macromolecular assemblies and computational protein structure prediction of small
protein domains are two methods approaching atomic
resolution.
References
1.
^ Kendrew JC, Bodo G,
Dintzis HM, Parrish RG, Wyckoff H, Phillips DC. (1958). A three-dimensional
model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by x-ray analysis. Nature
181(4610):662-6.
2.
^ a
b c
Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipurksy SL,
Darnell J. (2004). Molecular Cell Biology 5th ed. WH Freeman and
Company: New York, NY.
3.
^ Dobson CM. (2000). The
nature and significance of protein folding. In Mechanisms of Protein Folding
2nd ed. Ed. RH Pain. Frontiers in Molecular Biology series. Oxford
University Press: New York, NY.
4.
^ Fulton AB, Isaacs WB. (1991).
Titin, a huge, elastic sarcomeric protein with a probable role in
morphogenesis. Bioessays 13(4):157-61.
5.
^ a b Branden C, Tooze J. (1999). Introduction
to Protein Structure 2nd ed. Garland Publishing: New York, NY
6.
^ Gonen T, Cheng Y, Sliz
P, Hiroaki Y, Fujiyoshi Y, Harrison SC, Walz T. (2005). Lipid-protein
interactions in double-layered two-dimensional AQP0 crystals. Nature
438(7068):633-8.
7.
^ Walian P, Cross TA, Jap
BK. (2004). Structural genomics of membrane proteins Genome Biol 5(4):
215.
8.
^ a
b
Voet D, Voet JG. (2004). Biochemistry Vol 1 3rd ed. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
9.
^ Bairoch A. (2000). "The ENZYME database in 2000".
Nucleic Acids Res 28:
304-305. PMID
10592255.
10.
^ Radzicka A, Wolfenden R. (1995). "A proficient
enzyme.". Science 6
(267): 90-931. PMID
7809611.
11.
^ The Catalytic Site
Atlas at The European Bioinformatics Institute
12.
^ Zhang Y, Skolnick J.
(2005). The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the
current PDB library. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(4):1029-34.
13.
^ Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D. (2003).
Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science
302(5649):1364-8.
14.
^ Zagrovic B, Snow CD, Shirts MR, Pande VS. (2002). Simulation of folding of
a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed
computing. J Mol Biol 323(5):927-37.
15.
^ Herges T, Wenzel W.
(2005). In silico folding of a three helix protein and characterization of its
free-energy landscape in an all-atom force field. Phys Rev Let 94(1):018101.
16.
^ Hoffmann M, Wanko M, Strodel P, Konig PH, Frauenheim T, Schulten K, Thiel
W, Tajkhorshid E, Elstner M. (2006). Color tuning in rhodopsins: the mechanism
for the spectral shift between bacteriorhodopsin and sensory rhodopsin II. J
Am Chem Soc 128(33):10808-18.
*Sections taken from From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia